| Author | Message |
John Draper 
Posts: 76 Since: 10/29/2007

|  5/17/2008 8:04:21 PM 
Is there a way to test for it ??
|  |
|
David Kern 
Posts: 518 Since: 2/20/2008
|  5/17/2008 8:31:54 PM  Issue is the amount being recommended...
John,
The issue has to do with the 40% fly ash recommendation for LEEDS credits. This amount will definitely cause serious problems with all glued flooring.
The tests that are going to be conducted will determine what the safe threshold amount should be.
The 40% recommendation was obviously an arbitrary number (must have been pulled out of hat) that simply will not work with glued flooring of any type.
|  |
|
Darian Brown 
Posts: 712 Since: 2/5/2008
|  5/18/2008 8:43:57 PM 
I think doing a bond test would get you an ideal if it will hold or not.
|  |
|
Roland Thompson 
Posts: 281 Since: 2/27/2008
|  5/18/2008 9:50:21 PM 
If you are worried about it I would agree with Darian do a bond test and then PH and moisture testing document everything with time location of test with photos with results. We as installers are only responsable for the substrate at time of installation and I have it all documented many of times over. Question, How many job failure.s have been from Fly Ash?
FD
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/19/2008 9:31:43 AM 
I don't think Fly Ash Concrete is out there yet.
Architects who would specify this mix, are responsible for performance of products they specify and I don't know that Architects are sold on Fly Ash Concrete and don't think there is any Fly Ash Concrete out there just yet.
I hope they are testing more than just bonding issues.
|  |
|
David Kern 
Posts: 518 Since: 2/20/2008
| |
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/26/2008 10:15:12 PM 
quote: FYI
The next
Concrete, Moisture and Failures Seminar is August 13th and 14th.
I hope they have concrete experts there. Lou is a good writer and speaker, but not an authority on concrete.
|  |
|
Stephen Perrera 
Posts: 823 Since: 5/27/2008

|  5/27/2008 1:57:29 PM 
Greetings!
I did not read through the four pages but the topic caught my eye. Yes, fly ash concrete is out there.
I have subscribe'd to this website for quite awhile now. It has a forum and sends you news on concrete ect.
http://www.aggregateresearch.com/forum/
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/28/2008 7:13:26 PM  x
have you run into 40% fly ash Concrete yet Stephen?
I went to that site and did a search. FOund nothing on Fly Ash concrete or FLy Ash cement.
Last Edited 5/28/2008 7:15:56 PM
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/28/2008 7:19:39 PM  I did find this
(NEW DELHI, India) -- Scientists at University of New South Wales have turned the ash waste from coal-fired power stations into a global environmental solution which promises to slash emissions in construction sector by 20 per cent. Researchers at UNSW have converted the fine particulate pollution generated in coal furnaces, known as fly ash, into a new range of high-strength, lightweight building materials.
NOTICE: Lightweight building materials.. !!
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/28/2008 7:21:55 PM 
Found more articles. All of them make reference to "light weight" materials.
I wonder if they are looking to replace gypsum?
|  |
|
Stephen Perrera 
Posts: 823 Since: 5/27/2008

|  5/29/2008 1:16:46 AM 
Try posting a question in the forum. You might get repiles from all over the world.
I have read many conversations about the use of fly ah in concrete over the years.
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/29/2008 9:58:17 AM 
Fly ash has been in concrete for years. That is not the problem. The problem is 40% FLy Ash, by weight, in the cement (not the concrete mix, but the cement itself).
Fly Ash weighs nearly nothing so I wonder what 40% by weight is by volumn. By volume is that 40% going to turn into 80%?
|  |
|
Stephen Perrera 
Posts: 823 Since: 5/27/2008

|  5/29/2008 6:45:05 PM 
So what exactly is Lou Migilore and his side kick trying to say in that article? Adhesive does not stick due to the roundness or spherical nature of fly ash?
And where are these issues or failures documented?
Quote: "The key problem with EXCESSIVE add-mixes is "Efflorescence".. this is alkali leeching out of the concrete. "
I think a few people have their head up their fly ash.
Last Edited 5/29/2008 6:48:45 PM
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  5/29/2008 7:29:11 PM 
Stephen, we've been through this before if you read the entire thread. There are no 40% fly ash concrete jobs out there yet, as far as anybody knows of. Lou is trying to "head this off at the Pass" and better understand the situation before it goes anywhere. And I agree with your assesment of the fly ash situation concerning bonding. All they have to do is finish the surface with a light broom and the bonding issue is resolved. I'm more conserned about Flex/cracking/vapor/absorption of vapor from the air, ect. There is much more to look at than just bonding....
x
|  |
|
Stephen Perrera 
Posts: 823 Since: 5/27/2008

|  5/31/2008 6:13:22 PM 
How about 100% fly ash concrete like the romans used?
I found this. It actually may be better than portland as far as moisture and efflorescence is concerned.
As previously described, the paste is the key to durable and strong concrete, assuming average quality aggregates are used. At full hydration, concrete made with typical cements produces approximately 1/4 pound of non-durable lime per pound of cement in the mix. Most people have seen concrete or masonry walls or slabs with the white, chalky surface coating or streaks called efflorescence. Efflorescence is caused by the face of the concrete being wetted and dried repeatedly, or by the movement of water vapor from the damp side of the concrete to the dry side through the capillaries (voids), drawing out the water soluble lime from the concrete, block or mortar. A typical 5 sack concrete mix having 470 pounds of cement per cubic yard has the potential of producing 118 pounds of lime. Fly ash chemically reacts with this lime to create more CSH, the same “glue” produced by the hydration of cement and water, thereby closing off the capillaries that allow the movement of moisture through the concrete. The result is concrete that is less permeable, as witnessed by the reduction in efflorescence.
And then some other interesting facts about it.
Other evidence of the contribution fly ash makes to strength and durability includes: – Cement has an upper limit of roughly 7.5 sacks (7.5 x 94# sack = 705#) when using 1" maximum size aggregate, above which the psi per pound of cement strength contribution in a concrete mix diminishes rapidly. The tallest concrete structures in the world are made with concrete where fly ash is a necessary component. Its ability to contribute to additional CSH, lower water demand, reduced heat of hydration and its fine particle size are crucial to making high-strength concrete (8,000 psi to over 20,000 psi). – Cement was invented in 1824, over 170 years ago. There are examples on the west coast of Italy, in a town named Cosa, where a mixture of natural pozzolans (volcanic) were combined with lime to produce concrete that has withstood waves and attack from seawater for over 2,000 years and is still intact. – The Pantheon in Rome is a pozzolan and lime concrete structure built around 300 B.C. and still stands today. It features a cast concrete dome 124 feet in diameter and was the world’s largest domed structure until modern times.
|  |
|
Ray Darrah 
Posts: 1411 Since: 2/18/2008
|  6/1/2008 2:13:12 PM 
so where did they obtain fly ash? Did they have coal burning stoves or something?
|  |
|
Stephen Perrera 
Posts: 823 Since: 5/27/2008

|  6/1/2008 3:51:01 PM 
C.mon Ray. Volcanic....natural pozzolans. More importantly the article touches on issues you and Lew were worried about. That research took me all of ten minutes. I have the pdf file if you want to read the whole shebang and who wrote it but thats gonna cost you another case of whiky whiky.
|  |
|
David Kern 
Posts: 518 Since: 2/20/2008
|  6/1/2008 5:14:19 PM  Strength isn't the urgent issue here...
This issue started because LEEDS accepted an arbitrary number (40% fly-ash content in slabs) in offering LEEDS credits for construction companies.
The problem that those in-the-know are aware of is that no adhesive will stick to a slab that has that much fly-ash content (regardless of being broom-swept or not) and that applies to thin-set as well.
This translates into an industry nightmare where any flooring that has to be glued or thin-setted will not stay down.
This is why the controlled pours are going to be done in Dalton. To determine how much fly-ash is too much.
Stay tuned...
By the way, great article Stephen.
Last Edited 6/1/2008 5:15:32 PM
|  |
|
Hugh Scott 
Posts: 194 Since: 6/1/2008
|  6/1/2008 7:21:00 PM  What impact...
does the fly ash have on the expansion rate of concrete?
If it hardens it does it impede expansion ?
We know concrete has the same expansion rate of steel. .008 mm per 10 ft per 10 degrees C.
|  |
|
Displaying page 4 of 7 Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next |