FloorBiz.com

 View Thread 
Post Reply  
AuthorMessage
Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
9:28:01 PM 
Industry standard--That makes me smile Ray

What was the industry standard for pad, from say 1971, to about 1998 or 1999?

How did the industry finally come to a standard for the pad Ray or should I say why did they come to todays standard for padding?


Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
9:37:38 PM 

Maybe you didn't know Ray, but I am the reason pad has a standard today.

Maybe you also didn't know Ray, but back in 1971, at least to about 78, the shop samples had tuft bind standards, as well as face weights.

The industry quit teaching consumers Ray. Now it's just tell the consumer, oh doesn't that piece of carpet have a nice feel. Smile


Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
9:52:33 PM 

Until 98 or 99, the industry sold padding as thick as one inch high.

I addressed what I saw as ignorance in our industry. I told everyone that the tackstrip with pin height included, is just a tad over 7/16ths of an inch high. I asked the industry why it was selling padding any thicker than ---at the very most, one half inch high.

The industry brought about pad standards, after I said what I did, but they didn't do it right then, because they would have had to give me credit and God knows this industry can't do that, so it waited awhile and quietly added it in as standards for the industry. Pad should be 7/16ths inch high, but 1/2 inch can be used.

Later, I kept speaking on behalf of rebond pad--which was very cheap at the time and I was telling everyone that rebond pad was better than most all other pads, so they started upping the prices for rebond, to where it is as expensive as most all others, if not more-so--well, rubber costs more.

If you or anyone think that's not true, I can prove even more.


Ray Darrah Send User a Message
Posts: 1411
Since: 2/18/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
10:18:16 PM 
Is the standard 1/2"


I did not know Jim Ryan is the reason for a standard for cushion.

Where is the Standard Written?

Smile


Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
10:24:10 PM 

quote:
I did not know Jim Ryan is the reason for a standard for cushion.

Where is the Standard Written?

Smile



hahahahahahaha, see there, it's whatever is wanted at the moment.

The mills taught the salesmen thru their sample carpets and the salespeople taught their customers the same ways.

That's why I asked you about face weight. Both face weight and tuft bind standards were common to all the information on the backs of the carpet samples until about 78. After that, the mills quit putting face weights and tuft bind standards on those sample pieces. Now they put other stuff on there.


Ray Darrah Send User a Message
Posts: 1411
Since: 2/18/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
10:46:56 PM 

There are Standards:

HUD/FHA:
D. Bonded
*
ASTM D3574-91
density lbs./cu ft. –5% (polymer) 5.0 6.5
thickness in. –5% 0.375 0.375

The CRI-104 and 105 also have standards as do the manufacturers.



Last Edited 3/7/2008
10:47:59 PM

Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
11:33:58 PM 

quote:
There are Standards:

HUD/FHA:
D. Bonded
*
ASTM D3574-91
density lbs./cu ft. –5% (polymer) 5.0 6.5
thickness in. –5% 0.375 0.375

The CRI-104 and 105 also have standards as do the manufacturers.



Yea Ray, and we used to have a constitution in this country that ment something, until our so called leaders started spitting on it and the American people as well.

In my heart I know right from wrong, because my AMERICAN MOTHER TAUGHT ME. In my heart, mind and soul, I know my industry inside and out and while I may back off some, when other people try to treat me badly, well, let's just say I've been thrown off every board except for this one, because I will take a stand when pushed too hard or treated like an idiot.



Last Edited 3/7/2008
11:36:59 PM

Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/7/2008
11:48:55 PM 

Ray, you say,---Is the standard 1/2"

I did not know Jim Ryan is the reason for a standard for cushion.

Where is the Standard Written?

I respond, don't you know the standards Ray? Shouldn't the inspectors know all the standards? Smile

Standard height for pad is 7/16ths of an inch thick. 1/2 inch can be used, but if you put it up to the strip, it is taller than the nails that are suppossed to hold the carpet.


Ray Darrah Send User a Message
Posts: 1411
Since: 2/18/2008


Post Reply
3/8/2008
6:41:12 AM 
I put up the standards for you Jim.

I post the standards and then you say I don't know them?
Smile

OK, I agree.. I can post them but not read them Smile


Jim Ryan Send User a Message
Posts: 958
Since: 1/12/2008


Post Reply
3/8/2008
7:19:38 AM 

quote:
I post the standards and then you say I don't know them?
Smile

OK, I agree.. I can post them but not read them Smile



Just because you post standards, doesn't mean they make any sense, but then they don't have to, because man is bound and determined to destroy himself and his children.


Darian Brown Send User a Message
Posts: 712
Since: 2/5/2008


Post Reply
3/8/2008
9:43:34 AM 

Did you have a percentage table to work by from the mill.


Post Reply
Home  |  Search  |  Help  |  Membership  |  Register

Transmitted: 5/12/2026
11:04:57 AM

Powered by FloorBiz Forums